|
Articles
Support offered for candidate Jim Rutledge
Planning to vote against budget
Eliminate use of speed cameras
Opposed to Cool Counties effort
The myth that there is a pro-residential growth wing of the
Republican Party here in Carroll County
6/20/10 - LETTER TO THE EDITOR, THE CARROLL COUNTY TIMES
Support offered for candidate Jim Rutledge
Since 2008 voters in Virginia, New Jersey and Massachusetts have
expressed their displeasure with the policies of President Barack
Obama.
Will this be the year for similar voter anger to be displayed in
Maryland?
Washington-based policies seem to be oriented to ever-increasing
spending and deficits. It is time to send a Senator to Washington who
retains a love for freedom and a respect for constitutionally limited
government and spending.
We have a choice this year to elect a new U.S. Senator. I'm backing
Jim Rutledge for this task. In fact, he's asked me to serve as his
honorary chair of his Carroll County campaign.
Rutledge has an impressive background professionally as a former
criminal prosecutor, but what is really impressive is when you listen
to him speak. He conveys a true passion returning our state and nation
to our founding principles in the Constitution.
There are a number of Republicans running for U.S. Senate this
year. Undecided voters should give each a thorough review.
If you are concerned about out of control federal spending and
deficits, I believe Rutledge shares your concern. If you are worried
about job creation based on the free enterprise system, I believe
Rutledge matches your concern.
If you seek an alternative to the current majority in Washington
that just seems out of touch with the needs of ordinary citizens,
there is a clear alternative. Vote for change not for change sake.
Vote for changed based on common sense conservative principles.
That is exactly the kind of a leader I've found in Rutledge. Please
review his record for yourself and compare him to the other
alternatives in the Republican primary this September.
Michael D. Zimmer
5/19/10 - LETTER TO THE EDITOR, THE CARROLL COUNTY TIMES
Planning to vote
against budget
Commissioners Julia Gouge and Dean Minnich have indicated will be
voting for the fiscal year 2011 budget. I will not.
Staff presented us a reasonable proposal in the recommended budget
relating to the structure of law enforcement. Their suggestion was to
shift nine resident troopers for nine sheriff deputies. They
calculated a savings to taxpayers of $45,000 per year per position
shifted. This concept enjoyed the support of two commissioners in
finalizing the commissioners' proposed budget.
The proposed budget is not the end of the process. On May 5 the
board held a public hearing. Two people testified at the hearing.
Their comments centered on education.
After the public hearing, Maryland State Police offered a
suggestion that had the effect of saving the nine resident trooper
positions and savings of $400,000 in fiscal year 2011. However, staff
calculated cost of $1.5 million over the course of our five year
operating plan with this concept.
Historically, this board of commissioners has paid close attention
not only to the next budget year in question, but also to the five
years following. For example, we have made cuts to the nearest fiscal
year in programs to prevent the out years from going into a negative
balance. The fiscal year 2011 process will depart from this practice.
According to the calculations of staff, fiscal year 2015 will now
show a negative balance. There is no good reason to take this course.
There are 1.5 million reasons not to accept it.
Both troopers and deputies are highly effective, highly motivated
and completely professional in how they protect and serve our county.
However, the administrative costs associated with the state resident
trooper program have escalated beyond what we can endure.
The rational for both sides of this decision can be reviewed in
context in the video directory of the county Web site. The two dates
in question would be the afternoon sessions on May 11 and May 13. You
watch, and you decide which approach makes the most sense.
Michael D. Zimmer
1/17/10 - LETTER TO THE EDITOR, THE CARROLL COUNTY TIMES
Eliminate use of speed
cameras
Editor:
The Associated Press ran a story recently regarding speed cameras
in Arizona. The headline was “Arizona may abandon speed cameras on
highways.”
According to the report, there are multiple threats to the program.
The story related that “profits are far below expectations.” Since
when is it appropriate for a government program to turn a profit?
There is also an active citizen effort to ban the cameras. The
group known as “Citizens Against Photo Radar” is seeking a ballot
question to stop the program.
I salute the people of Arizona and their love of liberty. When will
this same spirit come to Maryland? When will it come to Carroll
County?
Michael D. Zimmer
Eldersburg
OCTOBER 2009 - LETTER TO THE EDITOR, THE CARROLL COUNTY TIMES
Opposed to Cool Counties effort
Editor:
An honest to goodness public discussion has broken out in the Times on
the topic of global warming. That is a step in the right direction.
One should be skeptical of those who claim something like science is
all settled and we just have to reorder our entire economy as a
result.
I’m not a scientist, but I’ve enjoyed reading about what various
policy makers and scientist have shared on this topic. One such
scientist is Dr. Ian Plimer, a professor at the School of Earth and
Environmental Sciences at the University of Adelaide in Australia.
He’s written a book titled “Heaven and Earth: Global Warming and the
Missing Science.” He’s the two time winner of the Eureka Prize, the
highest scientific honor in Australia. He’s published several books
and more than 120 scientific papers.
According to Plimer “We live in a time when the methodology of science
is suspended.” He further asserts that reactions to the notion that
humans have caused global warming could be extremely costly and
distort energy policy. He observes that the “correct solution to the
non-problem of carbon dioxide is to have the courage to thoughtfully
do nothing.”
Dr. Freeman Dyson, otherwise known as the “eminent physicist,” spoke
about his theory of climate change at the Fredercik S. Pardee Center
for the Study of Longer-Range Future at Boston University. Dyson
stated, “all the fuss about global warming is grossly exaggerated.” As
reported in The New York Times Sunday Magazine, Dyson proposes,
“Whatever inflammations the climate was experiencing might be a good
thing because carbon dioxide helps plants of all kinds grow.”
In 2007, former President Vaclav Klaus of the Czech Republic shared
similar thoughts to the House of Representatives Committee on Energy
and Commerce. In his testimony, he stated, “It is impossible to
control natural factors causing climate change. The negative impact of
the proposed regulation on economic growth is to the detriment of all
other possible risks, including environmental ones.” Klaus continued
by noting, “Responsible politics should take into account the
opportunity costs of such [global warming] proposals and be aware of
the fact that the wasteful environmental policies are adopted to the
detriment of other policies, thus neglecting many other important
needs of millions of people all over the world.”
One might think the policy implications of global warming exist only
on the national level. That would be incorrect. Over my negative vote,
County Commissioners Julia Gouge and Dean Minnich approved Carroll
County joining what is known as the “Cool Counties” movement. Certain
spending proposals also relate back to the notion that human activity
causes global warming. I wonder what percentage of taxpayers favor
such an approach given the tight budget situation we face.
Mike Zimmer
Eldersburg
The writer is a member of the Carroll County Board of
Commissioners.
MARCH 2009 - LETTER TO THE EDITOR, THE EAGLE
Dear Editor,
It would not surprise me to learn that your columnist John Culleton
believed in Bigfoot. In his most recent effort he attempted to
perpetuate the myth that there is a pro-residential growth wing of the
Republican Party here in Carroll County.
As a former member of the Republican Central Committee and a member
and former officer of the South Carroll Republican Club I can assure
Mr. Culleton that this subject does not come up at meetings of either
group. There is a topic that has come up in the past and I'm sure will
again in the future. That subject is taxes.
During the term of the 2002 to 2006 Board of Commissioners that
Board voted to raise the recordation tax rate. They also voted to ask
the Senators and Delegates representing Carroll County in Annapolis
for the authority to impose a brand new tax on real estate transfers.
This is known as a transfer tax.
The GOP Central Committee and the South Carroll Republican Club
both voted to oppose the prior Board's effort to raise taxes. I'm
proud that two groups with which I was associated chose to stand on
the side of the people not to be overly burdened with new taxes.
When I decided to run for Commissioner opposition to the
transfer tax and support for tax relief were foundational elements of
my campaign. Elections have profound consequences. Neither of my
colleagues have embraced my call for tax relief or significant budget
savings.
In the budget process for fiscal year 2009 I asked my fellow
Commissioners to consider either reducing the cap on the Homestead Tax
Credit or reducing the rate of the real property tax. Neither
suggestion was supported.
In that same budget process I asked my fellow Board members to
embrace five different budget savings measures. Only one of my
proposals enjoyed support.
Mr. Culleton may be right about there being two different
wings of the GOP locally. However, I would say he's missed the
categories by a dozen country miles. It seems to me that the factions
would be the tax raising group and the tax relief group.
It will be interesting to see which element gains ascendancy
under a district system of electing Commissioners as opposed to a
county wide system.
Michael D. Zimmer
PS Jim,
Since this letter deals with primarily political issues, I
determined to write it from home and not use government resources in
this effort. I wanted you to be aware of my thinking on that subject
in case anyone were to inquire about that question. Thanks for your
willingness to promote lively discussion in your pages.
Mike Zimmer
MICHAEL D. ZIMMER
"A Leader Who Listens"
|